+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 578 Sydney voters.

45%
Yes
55%
No
45%
Yes
55%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 578 Sydney voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 578 Sydney voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Sydney voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZLXJRXanswered…5 days5D

Under strict conditions. Don’t want government investigating people for disagreeing with government policy

 @9WV5Y6Zanswered…4wks4W

Possibly, again, this appears to be for of a federal government question. Sounds suspicious or not in depth with detail etc.

 @9WR5QQWanswered…4wks4W

Tech campanies should be required only when there is sufficient reason to believe activities pertaining to the risk of national security are occuring, it should not be by default.

 @9WK3YLPanswered…4wks4W

maybe but there needs to be new regulations put in place to protect privecy such as needing a worrant for someting to do that kind of investigation

 @9WBP9K5answered…1mo1MO

Like bugging and telephone wire taps in the past, it would seem reasonable for gov agencies to have access where a reasonable suspicion exists and a magistrate has granted access.

 @9W7FMBVanswered…1mo1MO

I believe no for a general rule, as that can be harmful for privacy, yet there should be systems in place to flag dangerous online activity like engaging in human trafficking and weapons trafficking.

 @9SYC4SQanswered…3mos3MO