+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 181 Anti-Islam voters.

37%
Yes
63%
No
37%
Yes
63%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 181 Anti-Islam voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 181 Anti-Islam voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Anti-Islam voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZLXJRXanswered…2wks2W

Under strict conditions. Don’t want government investigating people for disagreeing with government policy

 @9WV5Y6Zanswered…1mo1MO

Possibly, again, this appears to be for of a federal government question. Sounds suspicious or not in depth with detail etc.

 @9WR5QQWanswered…1mo1MO

Tech campanies should be required only when there is sufficient reason to believe activities pertaining to the risk of national security are occuring, it should not be by default.

 @9WK3YLPanswered…1mo1MO

maybe but there needs to be new regulations put in place to protect privecy such as needing a worrant for someting to do that kind of investigation

 @9WBP9K5answered…1mo1MO

Like bugging and telephone wire taps in the past, it would seem reasonable for gov agencies to have access where a reasonable suspicion exists and a magistrate has granted access.

 @9W7FMBVanswered…1mo1MO

I believe no for a general rule, as that can be harmful for privacy, yet there should be systems in place to flag dangerous online activity like engaging in human trafficking and weapons trafficking.

 @9SYC4SQanswered…3mos3MO