Backdoor access means that tech companies would create a way for government authorities to bypass encryption, allowing them to access private communications for surveillance and investigation. Proponents argue that it helps law enforcement and intelligence agencies prevent terrorism and criminal activities by providing necessary access to information. Opponents argue that it compromises user privacy, weakens overall security, and could be exploited by malicious actors.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Local Government Area
State Electorate
Suburb
Postcode
Response rates from 233 Greens voters.
51% Yes |
49% No |
51% Yes |
49% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 233 Greens voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 233 Greens voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Greens voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZLXJRX3wks3W
Under strict conditions. Don’t want government investigating people for disagreeing with government policy
@9WV5Y6Z1mo1MO
Possibly, again, this appears to be for of a federal government question. Sounds suspicious or not in depth with detail etc.
@9WR5QQW1mo1MO
Tech campanies should be required only when there is sufficient reason to believe activities pertaining to the risk of national security are occuring, it should not be by default.
@9WK3YLP1mo1MO
maybe but there needs to be new regulations put in place to protect privecy such as needing a worrant for someting to do that kind of investigation
@9WBP9K51mo1MO
Like bugging and telephone wire taps in the past, it would seem reasonable for gov agencies to have access where a reasonable suspicion exists and a magistrate has granted access.
@9W7FMBV2mos2MO
I believe no for a general rule, as that can be harmful for privacy, yet there should be systems in place to flag dangerous online activity like engaging in human trafficking and weapons trafficking.
@9SYC4SQ3mos3MO
Only provide case by case basis and court orders for known terrorists.
@9SDXXLV4mos4MO
Yes, but if national security is securely defined.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
