+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 15.2k Australia voters.

46%
Yes
54%
No
46%
Yes
54%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 15.2k Australia voters.

Chart
Line chart with 4 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 15.2k Australia voters.

Chart
Line chart with 5 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZZ7YJ3answered…3mos3MO

No, any backdoor that exists for national security purposes also exists for anyone else clever enough to find it. There is no such thing as a backdoor that only specific people can use.

 @B2WPRX8answered…1wk1W

Government should only be targeting criminals and have policies and procedures in place to avoiding harming innocent people and pay for any damages caused to those innocent people

 @B2JP85Qanswered…4wks4W

No but increase spending for programs that infiltrate drug, sex trafficking and other illegal operations

 @9ZLXJRXanswered…3mos3MO

Under strict conditions. Don’t want government investigating people for disagreeing with government policy

 @9WV5Y6Zanswered…4mos4MO

Possibly, again, this appears to be for of a federal government question. Sounds suspicious or not in depth with detail etc.

 @9WR5QQWanswered…4mos4MO

Tech campanies should be required only when there is sufficient reason to believe activities pertaining to the risk of national security are occuring, it should not be by default.

 @9WK3YLPanswered…4mos4MO

maybe but there needs to be new regulations put in place to protect privecy such as needing a worrant for someting to do that kind of investigation

 @9WBP9K5answered…4mos4MO

Like bugging and telephone wire taps in the past, it would seem reasonable for gov agencies to have access where a reasonable suspicion exists and a magistrate has granted access.