Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
K>K Personal answerPro-choice |
Social › Gay Marriage
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Equal Pay
K>K Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Mental Health
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
K>K Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
K>K Personal answerYes, but only by court order |
Social › Euthanasia
K>K Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Aboriginal recognition
K>K Personal answerNo, Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders are Australian, thus I would argue they are recognized and represented, even if not by name. The constitution doesn't need to change. |
Social › Death Penalty
K>K Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
the Economy › Taxes
K>K Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Terrorist Citizenship
K>K Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Universal Dental Care
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Foreign Land Ownership
K>K Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
K>K Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
K>K Personal answerNo |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
K>K Personal answerYes, as long as the women are as qualified as their male counterparts. |
Domestic Policy › Internet Regulation
K>K Personal answerNo, do not censor or monitor data |
the Economy › Sunday Double Wages
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Fracking
K>K Personal answerNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatisation
K>K Personal answerI feel like there needs to better support for both aspects of our system as there are still life-threatening delays that need to be remedied. |
Domestic Policy › Woman Quotas
K>K Personal answerYes, but only as long as those candidates are equally qualified as their male counterparts. |
the Economy › Mining Water Use
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
K>K Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
K>K Personal answerYes, but scale back our current involvement |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
K>K Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
K>K Personal answerNo, Although medicinal use of certain substances should be legalized, but others should stay banned. |
Social › Women in Combat
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Coal Seam Gas
K>K Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
K>K Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Boat Immigrants
K>K Personal answerYes, they should be treated the same as those arriving by air |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
K>K Personal answerRaise |
Education › University Funding
K>K Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Marijuana
K>K Personal answerYes, and legalise, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it |
Social › Safe Schools
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › National Broadband Network
K>K Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › GP Visits
K>K Personal answerNo, America's healthcare is failing/has failed and we do not want to follow them down that (dangerous and difficult to rectify) road. |
Crime › Adler A110 Ban
K>K Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
K>K Personal answerYes, but the government should provide free language learning courses |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
K>K Personal answerDecrease, and the government should provide more incentives to prepare our citizens for these jobs |
the Economy › Negative Gearing
K>K Personal answerYes, this concession disproportionately benefits the rich |
Domestic Policy › Live Exports
K>K Personal answerNo, ban all live exports |
the Environment › Genetically Modified Foods
K>K Personal answerYes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified |
the Economy › Labor Unions
K>K Personal answerHelp, but ban their ability to make political donations |
Foreign Policy › U.S. Military Bases
K>K Personal answerYes, but only if it is a joint Australia/U.S. base |
Domestic Policy › High Speed Rail
K>K Personal answerYes, as long as it is affordable, well researched for safety and durability and implemented correctly. |
the Economy › Government Spending
K>K Personal answerLess foreign aid, fix Australia first. |
Foreign Policy › ISIS Ground Troops
K>K Personal answerYes, but only as a coordinated effort by the United Nations |
Foreign Policy › Whaling
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Rent Tax
K>K Personal answerYes, close loopholes and increase mining taxes |
the Environment › Uranium
K>K Personal answerNo |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
K>K Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
K>K Personal answerYes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations |
Social › Parental Leave
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Nuclear Waste
K>K Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Pensions
K>K Personal answerNo, not until we decrease our national debt |
Domestic Policy › Housing Bubble
K>K Personal answerNo, there are other things that could prevent this, than making it even harder to pay off your home. |
Healthcare › Hospitals
K>K Personal answerNo, this model encourages hospitals to use unnecessary expensive treatments on patients in order to make a profit |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
K>K Personal answerNo, but there should be checks in place to ensure a lack of corruption. |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
K>K Personal answerNo, and neither should corporations and business organizations |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
K>K Personal answerNo, there are too many hidden provisions in this specific agreement |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
K>K Personal answerDecrease, until we drastically reduce our national budget deficit |
Foreign Policy › Free Trade
K>K Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Bitcoin
K>K Personal answerYes, but it should not replace our national treasury-backed currency |
Education › Public School
K>K Personal answerYes, As long as each state was careful to regulate and manage their funding to ensure a better system and functionality than we already have. |
Foreign Policy › Egypt
K>K Personal answerNo, we should stay out of this |
Domestic Policy › Monarchy
K>K Personal answerYes, but there would need to be certain checks in place to ensure the economy could handle it etc. |
the Economy › ABCC
K>K Personal answerNo, we should establish a national broad-based anti-corruption watchdog instead |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You are a centrist on right wing and left wing issues. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically correct and politically incorrect issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on security and privacy issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “isolationism”, meaning you more often believe we should focus attention on our most pressing issues at home instead of involving ourselves in non-threatening issues abroad. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on progressive and traditional issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “small government”, meaning you more often believe the government is overly bureaucratic, inefficient, and wasteful. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “laissez-faire”, meaning you more often believe government intervention in economic markets leads to long term negative results. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on deregulation and regulation issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “assimilation”, meaning you more often believe we should be a unified culture. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 19 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.