This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
Response rates from 478 Australia voters.
7% Yes |
93% No |
6% Yes |
88% No |
1% Yes, assuming checks and balances are in place |
3% No, and AI should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives |
2% No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI yet |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 478 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 478 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZHLCFK1mo1MO
AI should be used to provide guidance / opinions / quantitative evidence and reasoning
@9VX8DKN2mos2MO
It should be used as a tool to provide outlines for decisions for and against convictions not as the final deciding factor
@9TQPHWX3mos3MO
The repairs should don't trust drastically in lives as said government feedback admins
@9SWQZYB4mos4MO
No, not within sentencing as this decision requires human legal judgement
@9S5K5PR4mos4MO
No, there should always be human input and decision making
@9RZM3V94mos4MO
Yes, as long as it does not perpetuate existing biases and is accountable.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
