This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Ideology
Response rates from 960 Left voters.
7% Yes |
93% No |
6% Yes |
85% No |
2% Yes, assuming checks and balances are in place |
6% No, and AI should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives |
2% No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI yet |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 960 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 960 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B44DXFK1wk1W
Yes, but only in cases where the majority of evidence is numerical in nature and requires thorough mathematical analysis.
@B3J5Y6X 4wks4W
Only as an aid to assist with no decision making power.
@B33P8JX1mo1MO
To make the final decision? No. That should be a board of “judges” not just one either. To aid the decision? Maybe.
@B2V2C392mos2MO
No, AI should not be used in any legal proceedings
@9TQPHWX6mos6MO
The repairs should don't trust drastically in lives as said government feedback admins
@9ZHLCFK5mos5MO
AI should be used to provide guidance / opinions / quantitative evidence and reasoning
@9VX8DKN6mos6MO
It should be used as a tool to provide outlines for decisions for and against convictions not as the final deciding factor
@9SWQZYB7mos7MO
No, not within sentencing as this decision requires human legal judgement
Join in on the most popular conversations.
