CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
State
Response rates from 1.1k Australia voters.
68% Yes |
32% No |
68% Yes |
32% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.1k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.1k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9X86DB32mos2MO
maybe, external party should also be apart of regulating, checking, and signing off.
@9W7FMBV2mos2MO
Yes but also, there should be exceptions like amputees, visually impaired and retarded people.
@9VPLW8R2mos2MO
i hate genetic modificatons stay as what u are born as
@9VMB7Y82mos2MO
I feel it can be used, but it would make everyone less unique. It would benefit chances of being bullied however if puts the world at a disadvantage because individuals are no longer different.
@9TKSK4D3mos3MO
I could be into it if it's means we can be like people (good people) from Cyberpunk
@9SMKKPV4mos4MO
The government should only regulate to make sure that the use is ethical and will only benefit people, not harm them
@9SB24SP4mos4MO
As long as it is before birth, and has the child's best interests at heart.
@9RSXS5H5mos5MO
Yes, while providing all legal allegations and cases to the public
Join in on the most popular conversations.
