+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.4k Left voters.

75%
Yes
25%
No
75%
Yes
25%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.4k Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.4k Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B3XZGQQanswered…2wks2W

Not more than other health regulations, scientist need some freedom to come up with new technologies

 @B34HX87from Arizona  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but only to prevent the creation of "designer babys", but not for the correction of various generic diseases and aliments.

 @B2WGS2Xanswered…2mos2MO

No, CRISPR should not be regulated beyond what any other medical research is. Introducing further regulation to medical research, using CRISPR as a straw man, is just political puffery meant to attract votes from laymen by exploiting fears and concerns around genetic research.

 @B2FGBGVanswered…3mos3MO

Yes, as long as it is heavily monitored so that no unnecessary human modifications (i.e., those that are not for health issues) occur

 @9X86DB3answered…5mos5MO

maybe, external party should also be apart of regulating, checking, and signing off.

 @9VMB7Y8answered…6mos6MO

I feel it can be used, but it would make everyone less unique. It would benefit chances of being bullied however if puts the world at a disadvantage because individuals are no longer different.

 @9TKSK4Danswered…7mos7MO

I could be into it if it's means we can be like people (good people) from Cyberpunk

 @9SMKKPVanswered…7mos7MO

The government should only regulate to make sure that the use is ethical and will only benefit people, not harm them