Assistance programs help homeowners who are at risk of losing their homes due to financial difficulties by providing financial support or restructuring loans. Proponents argue that it prevents people from losing their homes and stabilizes communities. Opponents argue that it encourages irresponsible borrowing and is unfair to those who pay their mortgages.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
State Electorate
Local Government Area
Trend of support over time for each answer from 25.5k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 25.5k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9RKZCVB2yrs2Y
@B4N293W1yr1Y
Yes, but it shouldn't come at the cost to the taxpayer, e.g. any financial assistance provided should be payed back in full. Restructuring home loans to give them longer to pay back the principal would be ideal. Financial education is something that I believe must be taught in schools from an early age, especially in the current economical times. The cost of living is ridiculous and financial freedom is near impossible to achieve thanks to years of greed.
@chachi_my_chachi2yrs2Y
@BDPHSSP4wks4W
@BDK47Z41mo1MO
@BDFQNQN 1mo1MO
@BDC3LNF1mo1MO
@BD99QW31mo1MO
Join in on the most popular conversations.
Based on 25.5k responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.