+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.3k Australia voters.

70%
Yes
30%
No
70%
Yes
30%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.3k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.3k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9RKZCVBanswered…4mos4MO

Yes, but only in extreme situations, and as long as it does not encourage irresponsible borrowing, and is not unfair to those who pay their mortgages.

  @chachi_my_chachianswered…2wks2W

They should provide it for a year or less, then stop. This way, if someone has fallen on tough times they can bounce back; if it's a pattern, they'll be foreclosed soon enough.

 @9Y3YFYZanswered…2wks2W

This depends on circumstances. If the banking system is allowed to loan money to people that can't afford it due to inaccurate forecasts by government and treasury, I suggest the government should take responsibility and provide assistance, especially for owner occupiers.

 @9X85PMZanswered…3wks3W

Yes, but only for low income persons or families. Wealthy persons are on their own and only have them selves to blame.

 @9WV2VP9answered…4wks4W

 @9WTMTL2answered…4wks4W

Yes, but the situations should be fairly monitored for reasons of foreclosure etc

 @9WTKHM6answered…4wks4W

 @9WRD8GRanswered…4wks4W

Yes, To those that only have one home ownership property in their name and currently reside in the home