Assistance programs help homeowners who are at risk of losing their homes due to financial difficulties by providing financial support or restructuring loans. Proponents argue that it prevents people from losing their homes and stabilizes communities. Opponents argue that it encourages irresponsible borrowing and is unfair to those who pay their mortgages.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Local Government Area
Response rates from 162 Melbourne (C) voters.
65% Yes |
35% No |
65% Yes |
35% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 162 Melbourne (C) voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 162 Melbourne (C) voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Melbourne (C) voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9RKZCVB6mos6MO
Yes, but only in extreme situations, and as long as it does not encourage irresponsible borrowing, and is not unfair to those who pay their mortgages.
@chachi_my_chachi2mos2MO
They should provide it for a year or less, then stop. This way, if someone has fallen on tough times they can bounce back; if it's a pattern, they'll be foreclosed soon enough.
@9Y3YFYZ2mos2MO
This depends on circumstances. If the banking system is allowed to loan money to people that can't afford it due to inaccurate forecasts by government and treasury, I suggest the government should take responsibility and provide assistance, especially for owner occupiers.
@9X85PMZ3mos3MO
Yes, but only for low income persons or families. Wealthy persons are on their own and only have them selves to blame.
@9WV2VP93mos3MO
Yes as long as there is a reasonable criteria of circumstances
@9WTMTL23mos3MO
Yes, but the situations should be fairly monitored for reasons of foreclosure etc
@9WTKHM63mos3MO
No, insurance companies and Work Cover help with that already
@9WRD8GR3mos3MO
Yes, To those that only have one home ownership property in their name and currently reside in the home
Join in on the most popular conversations.
