High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings. For instance, old warehouses can be renovated and turned into luxury lofts. Further, commercial buildings that are no longer in use can be refitted into high-rise apartments. Opponents argue that more housing will lower the value of their home (or rental units) and change the “character” of neighborhoods. Proponents argue that the buildings are more environmentally friendly than single family homes will lower housing costs for people who cannot afford large homes.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Local Government Area
State Electorate
Response rates from 17.2k Australia voters.
60% Yes |
40% No |
60% Yes |
40% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 17.2k Australia voters.
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 17.2k Australia voters.
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9LPB4H810mos10MO
Yes but other infrastructure such as public transport, roads, parking and healthcare etc need to be able to support this
@B345JQW18hrs18H
Build more apartments on top of shopping centers and other structures that take up considerable land
@B33ZG2T1 day1D
No, high density living reduces economic growth. As suburbs become overpopulated, prices increase through inflation rather than organically. High density living also puts strain on the public sector and its resources, reducing its effectiveness. The government should incentivize broader expansion away from cities and typical high density locations.
@B33V2HB1 day1D
Yes, so long as they arent build by Lebs that close the business after they get paid so they can avoid defects
@B32PLTH3 days3D
Too many dodgy developers. System wouldn’t be watched. Will cost millions to consumers if not heavily regulated.
@B32BGKC4 days4D
make landlords illegal, houses are HOMES not investments, the only exception should be student accomodation in universities, other than that, any property should be owned by the resident
@B2ZNBGC5 days5D
Yes, but not too harshly, and don't build properties to the point where the density is underwhelming to live in, and excessive land clearance must be done to build them
@B2ZDH7N5 days5D
Yes, but also ensure surrounding infrastructure can handle the high density, such as adequate hospitals, parking options and public transport,
Join in on the most popular conversations.