+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 232 Fraser voters.

49%
Yes
51%
No
49%
Yes
51%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 232 Fraser voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 232 Fraser voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Fraser voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9LPB4H8answered…8mos8MO

Yes but other infrastructure such as public transport, roads, parking and healthcare etc need to be able to support this

 @B24STGSanswered…1wk1W

Yes, but ensure there are provisions to allow for low density residential as well, and that they are not completely bought up by investors who don't use it.

 @B249TMKanswered…1wk1W

Yes, but only in locations where it makes sense such as near public transport infrastructure, city centers, etc.

 @9ZYNCH3answered…3wks3W

Only if building corruption is ended. Until then high density residential buildings are a liability costing people their lively hoods

 @9ZM933Ganswered…1mo1MO

Do you want to look like China? High density housing is terrible for the mental health of people who are already struggling. High density building of residential or corporate should be minimised EVERYWHERE! in australia

 @9YLH5TZ answered…2mos2MO

Yes, as long as building legislation includes provision for a minimum amount of greenspace around the residential properties

 @9YL3RSCanswered…2mos2MO

A clear assessment of the troubles with housing combined with sustainable solutions is importsntnin consideration of policy.

 @9Y3YFYZanswered…2mos2MO

Construction should be well planned and appropriate land given up for development by the federal government. The population should be kept stable to stop required development.