Militarization of police refers to the use of military equipment and tactics by law enforcement officers. This includes the use of armored vehicles, assault rifles, flashbang grenades, sniper rifles, and SWAT teams. Proponents argue that this equipment increases officers’ safety and enables them to better protect the public and other first responders. Opponents argue that police forces which received military equipment were more likely to have violent encounters with the public.
39% Yes |
61% No |
24% Yes |
53% No |
9% Yes, but only in response to extreme situations |
7% No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
6% Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
0% No, and abolish the police |
See how support for each position on “Demilitarize the Police” has changed over time for 37k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Demilitarize the Police” has changed over time for 37k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9C5RZWZ1yr1Y
Yes, but only to respond to extreme situations and with scrutinous training on how and when to use the equipment.
@9C2KGFR1yr1Y
Yes but with proper training and only in the most dangerous and extreme situations.
@9BWVCX91yr1Y
it depends on the situations
@9BWTVF91yr1Y
they should get to use tear gas on the criminals
@9BTZD7M1yr1Y
Only if they have been highly trained, have limited access and equipment amount, and have regulations.
@9BTY9XW1yr1Y
Yes, but only in extreme situations and with strict training on how to use the equipment
Join in on the most popular conversations.
