+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.9k Reason Party voters.

29%
Yes
71%
No
16%
Yes
63%
No
7%
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations
8%
No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment
5%
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment
0%
No, and abolish the police

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.9k Reason Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.9k Reason Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Reason Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9VMMG4Xanswered…2mos2MO

add a separate government department for homeland security as a middle between the police and the adf

 @9T6W4G6answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but only in response to extreme situation, and with extensive and strict training on how and when to use the equipment

 @9SQ56QGanswered…3mos3MO

if local police are to use them, only use them in response on extreme situations when external and higher agencies of help are too far away from the point of contact.

 @9JXWGCDanswered…9mos9MO

yes and no I agree with only with strict training on how and when but also if a higher agency can deal with the ssiue then they should not police

 @9LG7967answered…8mos8MO

Yes, but only in response to extreme circumstances where the people using the weapons have strict training on how and when to use the equipment.

 @9KD5WJVanswered…9mos9MO

yes, but only in specific circumstances such as an attempted coup or other large scale crimes such as terrorism

 @9BTZD7Manswered…2yrs2Y

Only if they have been highly trained, have limited access and equipment amount, and have regulations.