Try the political quiz
+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 44.2k Australia voters.

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 44.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 44.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @BDC3LNFanswered…7 days7D

Yes, but increase oversight and ensure that companies are taxed on volume extracted, not profits made

 @B8F82L4answered…6mos6MO

no but slowly change to sustainable rescources and help provide new jobs for those losing thier jobs because of it

 @B878Q4Zfrom California  answered…6mos6MO

no because we are not profiting off it as much as we should be. If we were making better returns then I can hear the case for it.

 @B4YT45Manswered…1yr1Y

Absolutely under no circumstances should this ever have been approved in Australia, the US has shown how damaging this technology can be

 @B38RCK7answered…1yr1Y

Yes, taxed at a much higher rate for an Australian Sovereign Fund and money used for renewable energy investment

 @B24STGSanswered…1yr1Y

No, pursuing fracking when we are trying to reduce our carbon footprints would be contradictory to that goal.

 @9ZNMKQBanswered…1yr1Y

It is okay, although oversight should be increased, but these resources should regardless be replaced by sustainable sources such as nuclear.