61%
Yes
39%
No
50%
Yes
33%
No
5%
Yes, as long as the local environment is not compromised
3%
No, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies
3%
Yes, if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents
2%
No, the government should never subsidize private businesses
2%
Yes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives
1%
No, but punish them for moving jobs out of the country
1%
Yes, but I would prefer lowering corporate taxes to benefit all local companies
0%
Yes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Corporate Subsidies” has changed over time for 11.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Corporate Subsidies” has changed over time for 11.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9MYFHGPanswered…2mos2MO

No, there should be no private industry. I say this because I love Marxism, Marxist-Leninism, Communism and class struggle as it's the only way to achieve a socialist society under capitalism when they'd happily violently put down a proletarian revolution

 @9LXVFS8answered…3mos3MO

Yes as long as local environment is not compromised, the company promises to new jobs by hiring local residents.

 @934RYWQanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes to regional and rural areas and employ locals. Not for movement overseas

 @8KJPSDHanswered…4yrs4Y

As long as they are taxed accordingly with no corporate payouts or incentives to sway dodgy politicians and the environment is a major concern and must be looked after. This and Farmers and their neighbours who it may also affect get to decide.