+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.4k Right voters.

71%
Yes
29%
No
67%
Yes
25%
No
2%
Yes, if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents
2%
No, but punish them for moving jobs out of the country
1%
Yes, as long as the local environment is not compromised
1%
No, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies
1%
Yes, but I would prefer lowering corporate taxes to benefit all local companies
1%
No, the government should never subsidize private businesses
1%
Yes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives
0%
Yes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.4k Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.4k Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Right voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9MYFHGPanswered…6mos6MO

No, there should be no private industry. I say this because I love Marxism, Marxist-Leninism, Communism and class struggle as it's the only way to achieve a socialist society under capitalism when they'd happily violently put down a proletarian revolution

 @9LXVFS8answered…7mos7MO

Yes as long as local environment is not compromised, the company promises to new jobs by hiring local residents.

 @934RYWQanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes to regional and rural areas and employ locals. Not for movement overseas

 @8TPFVBKanswered…3yrs3Y

As long as local environment is compromised, Tax revenue eventually exceeds the tax incentives, local citizens & residents are hired & can vote on the incentives

 @8RF7ZBDanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, they should be allowed to if they want, but they shouldn’t do it.

 @92LTWLDanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only if the local environment is not compromised, tax revenue will exceed the incentives, and they hire local residents.