79% Yes |
21% No |
69% Yes |
17% No |
5% Yes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions |
2% No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
4% Yes, and provide more free public transportation |
1% No, we have more important issues that need funding |
0% No, and we should privatize more public transportation services |
|
0% No, and we should reduce current spending |
See how support for each position on “Public Transportation” has changed over time for 335k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Public Transportation” has changed over time for 335k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9KL8KF91mo1MO
I think the government should increase funding but it also depends on how much the government already funds public transportation.
@9HCXTZW5mos5MO
Yes, and provide more free public transportation, but only only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions.
@95DVQNQ2yrs2Y
Yes, and provide more free public transportation and spend more towards environmentally friendly solutions
@95DKTGL2yrs2Y
No spending at all. Who actually does pay?
@93YMJLS2yrs2Y
@93VQS6H2yrs2Y
Explore other topics that are important to Australia voters.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)
