+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 19.2k Australia voters.

63%
Yes
37%
No
55%
Yes
31%
No
4%
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
5%
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
4%
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
1%
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
0%
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 19.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 19.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZTPDVManswered…3wks3W

No, the system of no term limits has worked well since its conception and there is not any need to introduce them at the moment.

 @9ZR2LN5answered…4wks4W

There shouldn't even be a Parliament or politicians because I believe the Crown should have absolute power

 @9WGR8YT answered…2mos2MO

No, but decrease salary and retirement benefits to be more inline with average wage, so they truly know what it’s like to live like those they serve.

 @9M8CT84answered…8mos8MO

Yes, there is one term for Prime minister. The prime minister will hold the title for 2-4 years until the public decides whether they want to change or keep the Prime minister, which will go for another 2-4 years and repeat it.

 @9GBPPS2answered…1yr1Y

Senators should be representatives of us, not chosen by the party. If this is the case, there should not be a term limit on the people's demands.

 @92TP7CJanswered…3yrs3Y

No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time, decrease their retirement benefits.

 @8ZRG8MFanswered…3yrs3Y