87% Yes |
13% No |
80% Yes |
13% No |
5% Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security |
1% No, but reduce their sentences |
3% Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained |
See how support for each position on “Whistleblower Protection” has changed over time for 17.3k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Whistleblower Protection” has changed over time for 17.3k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9HKY3774mos4MO
Yes, but slightly different to the national security option. Only if the information released doesn't harm our national security in a sense that for example it won't reveal classified strategic documents or reveal names of covert-operatives. They should be protected if the information released reveals actions by the government not in the public interest or if it is a violation of Commonwealth or international law.
@9992HTR 4mos4MO
Yes, whistleblowers are there to protect democracy and provide the public with necessary information.
@9CN2PRT9mos9MO
Yes, and free whistleblowers currently in prison, drop current cases against whistleblowers and strike all whistleblower charges from all criminal records.
@93R3M8Y2yrs2Y
They have laws but that does Protect people
@92XSYF42yrs2Y
Yes but Depending on the circumstances
@93367TN2yrs2Y
No because they took the ***** way out
Explore other topics that are important to Australia voters.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual…