Statistics are shown for this demographic
Local Government Area
Response rates from 857 5000 voters.
86% Yes |
14% No |
78% Yes |
13% No |
5% Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security |
1% No, but reduce their sentences |
2% Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 857 5000 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 857 5000 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from 5000 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9HKY37712mos12MO
Yes, but slightly different to the national security option. Only if the information released doesn't harm our national security in a sense that for example it won't reveal classified strategic documents or reveal names of covert-operatives. They should be protected if the information released reveals actions by the government not in the public interest or if it is a violation of Commonwealth or international law.
@9ZR2LN54 days4D
Whistleblowers are treacherous snakes and should have all information extracted from them before imprisoned
@9WRFSMN1mo1MO
Yes, provided that the whistleblower and no part nor have they gave false or misleading information and or statements.
@9992HTR 12mos12MO
Yes, whistleblowers are there to protect democracy and provide the public with necessary information.
@9CN2PRT1yr1Y
Yes, and free whistleblowers currently in prison, drop current cases against whistleblowers and strike all whistleblower charges from all criminal records.
@92XSYF43yrs3Y
Yes but Depending on the circumstances
@93R3M8Y2yrs2Y
They have laws but that does Protect people
@93367TN3yrs3Y
No because they took the ***** way out
Join in on the most popular conversations.
