+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 92.4k Australia voters.

38%
Yes
62%
No
15%
Yes
59%
No
17%
Yes, but only by court order
3%
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
4%
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
3%
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 92.4k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 92.4k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9TCC7H2answered…7mos7MO

Yes, as long as they use it to keep people safe. not take away freedoms, or use it as a form of control people.

 @9GGG49Zanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only to the extent that the individual expresses fanatical tendencies. Terrorism is it often used as excuse to increase surveillance.

 @B4NMQ3Tanswered…3 days3D

Only to monitor terrorism, those with serious criminal backgrounds and by court order for all others.

 @B4CKLPRanswered…2wks2W

Yes, but only in extreme cases if they have compiled enough evidence to show that the monitoring a phone call or email is used to prevent a serious crime or act of terrorism, and strong penalties should be given for misuse of power.

 @B44F8BYanswered…4wks4W

In general no, however in certain scenarios, such as those applying to individuals of dangerous nature, yes, although there must be a system of adequate checks and balances to prevent abuse.

 @B3WWHTHanswered…1mo1MO

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds, and furthermore only under court order. otherwise legislation should be enacted to prevent government surveillance of citizen communications.