+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 5.3k Adelaide voters.

38%
Yes
62%
No
14%
Yes
59%
No
17%
Yes, but only by court order
3%
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
4%
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
3%
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 5.3k Adelaide voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 5.3k Adelaide voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Adelaide voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9TCC7H2answered…5mos5MO

Yes, as long as they use it to keep people safe. not take away freedoms, or use it as a form of control people.

 @B2R8MS4answered…3 days3D

yes, but only if received prior intel in cases to prevent/stop violent, sexual, financial or fraudulent crimes

 @B2P932Janswered…7 days7D

No, only if the person is charged or suspected of/with violent and serious crimes, determined by court order

 @B2GPGNCfrom Guam  answered…3wks3W

Yes, but only for those with serious criminal backgrounds, and it must be court ordered to prevent breaching of privacy.

 @9ZT3VDNanswered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only through the Australian Signals Directorate and ADF, in dire cases of National Security due to terrorism.

 @9GGG49Zanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only to the extent that the individual expresses fanatical tendencies. Terrorism is it often used as excuse to increase surveillance.