+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 710 United Australia voters.

21%
Yes
79%
No
9%
Yes
76%
No
5%
Yes, but only by court order
3%
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
4%
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
2%
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 710 United Australia voters.

Please login to unlock historical data statistics

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 710 United Australia voters.

Chart
Line chart with 9 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from United Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9TCC7H2answered…7mos7MO

Yes, as long as they use it to keep people safe. not take away freedoms, or use it as a form of control people.

 @9GGG49Zanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only to the extent that the individual expresses fanatical tendencies. Terrorism is it often used as excuse to increase surveillance.

 @B44F8BYanswered…2wks2W

In general no, however in certain scenarios, such as those applying to individuals of dangerous nature, yes, although there must be a system of adequate checks and balances to prevent abuse.

 @B3WWHTHanswered…3wks3W

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds, and furthermore only under court order. otherwise legislation should be enacted to prevent government surveillance of citizen communications.

 @B2GPGNCfrom Guam  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only for those with serious criminal backgrounds, and it must be court ordered to prevent breaching of privacy.

 @9ZT3VDNanswered…4mos4MO

Yes, but only through the Australian Signals Directorate and ADF, in dire cases of National Security due to terrorism.