+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.1k Classical Liberalism voters.

42%
Yes
58%
No
41%
Yes
45%
No
1%
Yes, this gun’s availability would put the public at risk of a mass shooting
7%
No, and reverse the National Firearms Agreement
6%
No, this gun poses no greater risk than existing firearms

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.1k Classical Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.1k Classical Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Classical Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @4ZYP8SWfrom New South Wales  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4ZQXCQFfrom Western Australia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4ZC6RXQfrom Victoria  answered…4yrs4Y

The biggest killer of citizens with weapons are governments. Guns have a place however I question the need for rapid fire weapons... I am a sporting shooter!

 @4Z93XY7from South Australia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @99HPQBJanswered…2yrs2Y

no but they should only be used on farms or ranges not in public spaces and people must have a license specialised to the shotgun

 @9LMG6PSanswered…7mos7MO

instead of completely banning, have more intense restrictions and make it harder to gain a licence for this specific gun.