+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.5k Braddon voters.

81%
Yes
19%
No
77%
Yes
15%
No
4%
Yes, this gun’s availability would put the public at risk of a mass shooting
3%
No, this gun poses no greater risk than existing firearms
1%
No, and reverse the National Firearms Agreement

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.5k Braddon voters.

Chart
Line chart with 7 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.5k Braddon voters.

Chart
Line chart with 8 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Braddon voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @4ZYP8SWfrom New South Wales  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4ZQXCQFfrom Western Australia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4ZC6RXQfrom Victoria  answered…4yrs4Y

The biggest killer of citizens with weapons are governments. Guns have a place however I question the need for rapid fire weapons... I am a sporting shooter!

 @9LMG6PSanswered…12mos12MO

instead of completely banning, have more intense restrictions and make it harder to gain a licence for this specific gun.

 @4Z93XY7from South Australia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @B32DK5Nanswered…2mos2MO

No, but ensuring appropriate checks are done and regular auditing of weapons of this kind should be implemented