+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.2k Ku-ring-gai voters.

84%
Yes
16%
No
80%
Yes
12%
No
4%
Yes, this gun’s availability would put the public at risk of a mass shooting
2%
No, this gun poses no greater risk than existing firearms
1%
No, and reverse the National Firearms Agreement

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.2k Ku-ring-gai voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.2k Ku-ring-gai voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Ku-ring-gai voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @4ZYP8SWfrom New South Wales  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4ZQXCQFfrom Western Australia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4ZC6RXQfrom Victoria  answered…4yrs4Y

The biggest killer of citizens with weapons are governments. Guns have a place however I question the need for rapid fire weapons... I am a sporting shooter!

 @4Z93XY7from South Australia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @99HPQBJanswered…2yrs2Y

no but they should only be used on farms or ranges not in public spaces and people must have a license specialised to the shotgun

 @9LMG6PSanswered…7mos7MO

instead of completely banning, have more intense restrictions and make it harder to gain a licence for this specific gun.