This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
Response rates from 1.2k Australia voters.
8% Yes |
92% No |
6% Yes |
85% No |
2% Yes, assuming checks and balances are in place |
6% No, and AI should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives |
2% No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI yet |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.2k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.2k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B3J5Y6X 5 days5D
Only as an aid to assist with no decision making power.
@B33P8JX3wks3W
To make the final decision? No. That should be a board of “judges” not just one either. To aid the decision? Maybe.
@B2V2C394wks4W
No, AI should not be used in any legal proceedings
@9TQPHWX6mos6MO
The repairs should don't trust drastically in lives as said government feedback admins
@9ZHLCFK4mos4MO
AI should be used to provide guidance / opinions / quantitative evidence and reasoning
@9VX8DKN5mos5MO
It should be used as a tool to provide outlines for decisions for and against convictions not as the final deciding factor
@9SWQZYB6mos6MO
No, not within sentencing as this decision requires human legal judgement
@9S5K5PR7mos7MO
No, there should always be human input and decision making
Join in on the most popular conversations.
