Statistics are shown for this demographic
Local Government Area
Response rates from 18k Australia voters.
87% Yes |
13% No |
80% Yes |
13% No |
5% Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security |
1% No, but reduce their sentences |
3% Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 18k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 18k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9HKY3771yr1Y
Yes, but slightly different to the national security option. Only if the information released doesn't harm our national security in a sense that for example it won't reveal classified strategic documents or reveal names of covert-operatives. They should be protected if the information released reveals actions by the government not in the public interest or if it is a violation of Commonwealth or international law.
@B32RT3F1mo1MO
Yes, provided it was legally obtained and it is not released in a way that threatens national security.
@B2WGS2X2mos2MO
Yes, exposing abuses, violations and corruption should never be punished. And all those currently serving sentences should be released and compensated.
@9ZR2LN54mos4MO
Whistleblowers are treacherous snakes and should have all information extracted from them before imprisoned
@9WRFSMN5mos5MO
Yes, provided that the whistleblower and no part nor have they gave false or misleading information and or statements.
@9992HTR 1yr1Y
Yes, whistleblowers are there to protect democracy and provide the public with necessary information.
@9CN2PRT2yrs2Y
Yes, and free whistleblowers currently in prison, drop current cases against whistleblowers and strike all whistleblower charges from all criminal records.
@92XSYF43yrs3Y
Yes but Depending on the circumstances
Join in on the most popular conversations.
