+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.1k Australia voters.

71%
Yes
29%
No
71%
Yes
29%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.1k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.1k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9RKZCVBanswered…7mos7MO

Yes, but only in extreme situations, and as long as it does not encourage irresponsible borrowing, and is not unfair to those who pay their mortgages.

  @chachi_my_chachianswered…4mos4MO

They should provide it for a year or less, then stop. This way, if someone has fallen on tough times they can bounce back; if it's a pattern, they'll be foreclosed soon enough.

 @B3CKLNKanswered…1wk1W

Yes, but only to those who show they are not irresponsible with their money causing them to be unable to pay their mortage, only for those who are having sudden financial issues caused by lose of their job, medical issues (hospital fees), or family issues (death in family, nursing home costs) for example.

 @B2ZNBGCanswered…3wks3W

Depending on the home tenets' situation, if it is within their financial control, then no, but if circumstances occur out of their control, then the government should chip in fairly minor amounts of financial aid.

 @9WTMTL2answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but the situations should be fairly monitored for reasons of foreclosure etc

 @9WTKHM6answered…4mos4MO

 @9WRD8GRanswered…4mos4MO

Yes, To those that only have one home ownership property in their name and currently reside in the home

 @9WKK2TManswered…4mos4MO

Yes but only those meeting very strict criteria as government cannot afford to bail out everyone. Government to help them to link into services to receive help for long term sustainability.