+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 10.2k Brisbane (C) voters.

40%
Yes
60%
No
16%
Yes
56%
No
17%
Yes, but only by court order
3%
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
4%
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
3%
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 10.2k Brisbane (C) voters.

Chart
Line chart with 8 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 10.2k Brisbane (C) voters.

Chart
Line chart with 9 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Brisbane (C) voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9TCC7H2answered…7mos7MO

Yes, as long as they use it to keep people safe. not take away freedoms, or use it as a form of control people.

 @9GGG49Zanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only to the extent that the individual expresses fanatical tendencies. Terrorism is it often used as excuse to increase surveillance.

 @B44F8BYanswered…1wk1W

In general no, however in certain scenarios, such as those applying to individuals of dangerous nature, yes, although there must be a system of adequate checks and balances to prevent abuse.

 @B3WWHTHanswered…2wks2W

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds, and furthermore only under court order. otherwise legislation should be enacted to prevent government surveillance of citizen communications.

 @B2GPGNCfrom Guam  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only for those with serious criminal backgrounds, and it must be court ordered to prevent breaching of privacy.

 @9ZT3VDNanswered…4mos4MO

Yes, but only through the Australian Signals Directorate and ADF, in dire cases of National Security due to terrorism.