Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
4>4 Personal answerPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child |
the Economy › Equal Pay
4>4 Personal answerNo, and the gender wage gap is a myth No, the current requirements in the Equal Pay Act of 1963 are already sufficient No, there are too many other variables such as education, experience, and tenure that determine a fair salary |
Social › Gay Marriage
4>4 Personal answerNo, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage |
Healthcare › Mental Health
4>4 Personal answerNo, this issue should be dealt with by the states |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
4>4 Personal answerNo, and I believe global warming is a natural occurrence that is being hyped up to tax the population more. No, and all governments past and present are over-regulating business. No, provide more incentive for businesses to clean up their act themselves. No, Embrace electric cars and build infrastructure to accomodate. No, Work with the csiro and farmers to implement more efficient and best practice methods into agriculture. Everyone knows agriculture is a bigger polluter than fossil fuels but agriculture has heavy economic impact. |
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only by court order |
Social › Euthanasia
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
the Economy › Taxes
4>4 Personal answerReform to a flat tax |
Healthcare › Universal Dental Care
4>4 Personal answerAre we socialist?? I don't work to pay for someone else's dental care. More competition in the market will reduce cost. |
the Environment › Foreign Land Ownership
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should protect the jobs of our farmers |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
4>4 Personal answerNo, and eliminate all wage standards |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Internet Regulation
4>4 Personal answerNo, do not censor or monitor data |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatisation
4>4 Personal answerThe current system is not sustainable. Privatise and allow free market health insurance so their is competition between health care providers and insurers. Once upon a time we had a great system but now due to ill health of citizens and rising immigration where our system is seen as a right and not a privilege it has become unsustainable. |
the Economy › Mining Water Use
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
4>4 Personal answerNo, recession is a natural cycle that purges excess |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
4>4 Personal answerNo, and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answerYes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should have the political will to remove the drugs from our streets. I'm sure the authorities know who the dealers/importers are and are most likely to be. I honestly think that it is such a lucrative black market business that the government turns a blind eye or lacks the political will to enforce the law. |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
4>4 Personal answerRegardless, we should end all social welfare programs |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should let China address this issue |
the Environment › Coal Seam Gas
4>4 Personal answerYes, but increase environmental restrictions and oversight |
Immigration › Boat Immigrants
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
4>4 Personal answerLower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes |
Education › University Funding
4>4 Personal answerYes, and end government funding for universities |
Healthcare › Marijuana
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › National Broadband Network
4>4 Personal answerAgain more fraud in the government and businesses taking advantage of stupid politicians. The massive blowout with almost no accountability is absurd. I say privatise only because governments these days lack the capability to do government works effectively. We can't even build roads, almost all major roads recently have been done privately and now we pay toll. Just another tax on the people this will be the same. so sad. |
Crime › Adler A110 Ban
4>4 Personal answerNo, this gun poses no greater risk than existing firearms |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
4>4 Personal answerIncrease |
Domestic Policy › Live Exports
4>4 Personal answerNo, ban all live exports. If we build the infrastructure to accomodate farming, slaughtering, Butchering, freezing then exporting. We can create jobs and profits for Australia. Indonesia is the case in point here and i understand they want their beef certified halal. I'm pretty sure we can set up a halal slaughterhouse for this to be done. |
the Economy › Negative Gearing
4>4 Personal answerYes, It should not have been implemented in the beginning, all it has done is remove normal market forces from regulating house prices. We have ruined three generation that could have created true wealth by creating instead they buy property and speculate. This will fix itself eventually but a lot of people will be very unhappy when they are over capitalised in a falling market. |
the Environment › Genetically Modified Foods
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Labor Unions
4>4 Personal answerHurt, free market forces will regulate any business/industy. If a business/industry wants the right people they will offer them the right money and working conditions if they don't those people will go elsewhere. Very simple. |
Foreign Policy › U.S. Military Bases
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only if it is a joint Australia/U.S. base |
Domestic Policy › High Speed Rail
4>4 Personal answerYes, linking major eastern cities. |
the Economy › Government Spending
4>4 Personal answerYes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional |
Foreign Policy › Whaling
4>4 Personal answerYes, and take an active stance to stop whaling all over the world |
the Economy › Rent Tax
4>4 Personal answerYes, close loopholes and increase mining taxes |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
4>4 Personal answerNo, end all government subsidies and let the free market run its course but completely get out of the way. Instead of subsidies how about infrastructure project to assist with bringing their product to market and overseas markets. |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Housing Bubble
4>4 Personal answerThey can't and won't. Due to our over indulgence in debt financing for unproductive assets like housing. We will have a crash to deleverage malinvestment in the housing market. It's inevitable. |
Healthcare › Hospitals
4>4 Personal answerYes, this helps keeps costs at a standardised rate nationwide |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
4>4 Personal answerNo, and neither should corporations and business organizations |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
4>4 Personal answerDecrease, and we should not give foreign aid to any countries |
the Economy › Bitcoin
4>4 Personal answerNo, anything created by man can be distorted and bitcoin has no intrinsic value except the supply and demand value. Gold and silver are the only forms of currency that cannot be replicated and hold true value. Why we went away from a gold backed currency is beyond me. Actually its not, it's so governments could print money with no regard for inflation. Hence why the us dollar has lost 97% buying power since 1915 the world reserve, scary! |
Foreign Policy › Egypt
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should stay out of this |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You are a centrist on right wing and left wing issues. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically correct and politically incorrect issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on security and privacy issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “isolationism”, meaning you more often believe we should focus attention on our most pressing issues at home instead of involving ourselves in non-threatening issues abroad. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on progressive and traditional issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “small government”, meaning you more often believe the government is overly bureaucratic, inefficient, and wasteful. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “laissez-faire”, meaning you more often believe government intervention in economic markets leads to long term negative results. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on deregulation and regulation issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “assimilation”, meaning you more often believe we should be a unified culture. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.