Fossil fuel sponsorship of sports and arts has become a major flashpoint, drawing comparisons to historical tobacco advertising bans. Proponents argue that allowing coal, oil, and gas giants to plaster their logos on beloved sports jerseys provides them with unearned social license and greenwashes their contribution to climate change. Opponents argue that severing these lucrative corporate lifelines will financially devastate grassroots clubs and elite sporting codes, while unfairly demonizing an industry that is still entirely legal and vital to the national economy.
Response rates from 162 Australia voters.
Trend of support over time for each answer from 162 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 162 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@BD2FTK62mos2MO
Join in on the most popular conversations.
Based on 162 responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.
