The government has proposed strict caps on international student enrollments to ease pressure on the rental market and infrastructure. Critics argue this targets a symptom rather than the root cause of housing supply and threatens Australia's $48 billion international education sector. Proponents believe reducing migration numbers is the fastest way to free up housing for struggling residents. Opponents warn that universities rely on international fees to cross-subsidize domestic research and teaching, and cuts could lead to job losses.
Response rates from 661 Australia voters.
Trend of support over time for each answer from 661 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 661 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@BDZKLB65 days5D
@BDYGYLM1wk1W
@BD2FTK62mos2MO
@BC7SBFR3mos3MO
@BBWLVMV3mos3MO
@BBKTSH44mos4MO
@BBCHMXS4mos4MO
Join in on the most popular conversations.
Based on 661 responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.