Try the political quiz

Answer Overview

Response rates from 135 Australia voters.

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 135 Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 135 Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @BDZ53K2answered…1wk1W

Yes, for unnecessary immigrants from safe countries, but allow asylum seekers and needed-working immigrants like nurses and doctors

 @B2F9ZZ7 answered…2mos2MO

Yes. Currently, our intake is higher than is prudent for our national interest. It should be more around the 100,000 mark. This was only brought in under Howard to artificially inflate the economic growth figure. It's time to go back down.

 @BC7SBFRanswered…3mos3MO

Yes, it is likely neccessary to reduce pressure on infastructure and ensure better economic stability, but certain programs may need to be continued to ensure the operation of key industries.

 @BBZG4BQanswered…3mos3MO

All three 'No' responses are partially correct, but the real issue around housing is that govt has not been building enough housing, and so the private sector does what is most profitable - building expensive homes for well off people.
NO competition has led to developers and landowners drip feeding the market in order to maintain profits at maximum levels.
And the investor friendly policies need to go.
Housing needs to be a 'right' not an 'option'.

 @B9ZFX39 answered…4mos4MO

Yes, We are full and our Infrastructure cannot cope, along with the crisis being fueled by Investors and Private equity firms.

About This Data

Based on 135 responses to this question.

These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).

iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.

Read Our Full Methodology →

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.

Cite This Poll

iSideWith. (2026). “Should the government drastically reduce the annual intake of immigrants to ease the housing crisis?” — Public Opinion Poll Results. Retrieved June 18, 2026, from https://australia.isidewith.com/poll/5544450222

Embed The Live Result

Preview