Lab-grown meat is produced by culturing animal cells and could serve as an alternative to traditional livestock farming. Proponents argue that it can reduce environmental impact and animal suffering, and improve food security. Opponents argue that it may face public resistance and unknown long-term health effects.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Local Government Area
State Electorate
Suburb
Response rates from 1.6k Queensland voters.
39% Yes |
61% No |
31% Yes |
54% No |
8% Yes, as long as a disclosure is prominently displayed on packaging and restaurant menus |
6% No, we need more long-term studies to ensure safety |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.6k Queensland voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.6k Queensland voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Queensland voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9XCNXDG4wks4W
We need to ensure that it's safe to eat, and it's a good thing to do while we try to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions from cows
@9WV5Y6Z1mo1MO
Yes there should be more studies for safety and authentication. But it must be disclosed clearly on packaging and restaurant menus etc
@9NMMS896mos6MO
Use of lab-grown meat to curb hunger and poverty, not mass commercialisation.
@9VF5BT42mos2MO
yes, as long as all ways of cleaning and keeping the meat sanitary are kept in mind and taken seriously
@9T6575J3mos3MO
Yes, but we need more long-term studies to ensure safety, and products with lab-grown meat need to prominently display that on packaging and restaurant menus
@9RXQJJ34mos4MO
Yes but it needs to be made clear as to what it is at the supermarket
@9RSXS5H4mos4MO
No, long term studies should be peer reviewed and then voted on first
@9QS3S9L5mos5MO
Yes, this is necessary to prevent factory farms which allow animal cruelty.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
