This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
Response rates from 920 Australia voters.
54% Yes |
46% No |
54% Yes |
46% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 920 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 920 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B39866F2wks2W
yes with ADAS putting them in newest cars that are being made and recessed within 12 weeks before they sold
@B34HX872wks2W
Self driving should be allowed when determined safe to do so.
@B2ZHWGD3wks3W
Only enforce regulations that directly involved risk to human life, such as harm reduction, to ensure AI doesn't arbitrarily determine the value of human life.
@B2WGS2X4wks4W
Yes, but only when guided by unbiased research and the general consensus of experts.
@B2VQX4L4wks4W
Yes, but only to protect privacy, consumer rights, and to ensure vehicles function into the future.
@9VWLWDN5mos5MO
yes, but just the ones that assist you're driving not fully autonomous.
@9SYC4SQ6mos6MO
Only AI and self-driving systems until the far future (as in communist post-scarcity economy). Safety checks can remain. Design cars so they crumple instead of ripping or folding. Discourage purchases of SUVs and heavy utility trucks by consumers who don’t need them but only buy them for status.
@9RZ59JM7mos7MO
yes, give me buttons and switches as well as a screen.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
