This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
State Electorate
Local Government Area
Suburb
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.2k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.2k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@BDPHSSP4wks4W
@BCMR6VV 2mos2MO
@B57NYYH1yr1Y
Yes; humans must maintain meaningful control over their vehicle, and thus retain accountability; vehicle driver liability, even during ‘fully’ automated driving. This should further coincide with specific government restrictions/regulations, on the use of advanced technology in vehicles, in order to deter absolute and over reliance on these advanced technologies; prevent driver complacency, and increase road safety.
@9SYC4SQ2yrs2Y
@9RZ59JM2yrs2Y
@9RTRN3J2yrs2Y
@B4ZP2XZ1yr1Y
I think that there should be cars that had advanced technology but maybe the Government could introduce a new type of restricted license for advanced drivers that are intelligent and aware enough to drive with said technology. They must be able to pass some kind of special test to obtain such vehicles in the first place.
@B4XQCB81yr1Y
Join in on the most popular conversations.
Based on 2.2k responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.