This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
Response rates from 258 Left voters.
50% Yes |
50% No |
50% Yes |
50% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 258 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 258 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZTPDVM1mo1MO
Yes, but only if such technology has significant control over the vehicle's operation and is difficult to disable at a moment's notice.
@9VWLWDN3mos3MO
yes, but just the ones that assist you're driving not fully autonomous.
@9SYC4SQ4mos4MO
Only AI and self-driving systems until the far future (as in communist post-scarcity economy). Safety checks can remain. Design cars so they crumple instead of ripping or folding. Discourage purchases of SUVs and heavy utility trucks by consumers who don’t need them but only buy them for status.
@9RZ59JM5mos5MO
yes, give me buttons and switches as well as a screen.
@9RTRN3J5mos5MO
Yes because humans still need to fixed robots but I believe we should keep humans more than robots
Join in on the most popular conversations.
