Full accessibility ensures that public transportation accommodates people with disabilities by providing necessary facilities and services. Proponents argue that it ensures equal access, promotes independence for people with disabilities, and complies with disability rights. Opponents argue that it can be costly to implement and maintain and may require significant modifications to existing systems.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
State
Response rates from 1.1k Australia voters.
94% Yes |
6% No |
94% Yes |
6% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.1k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.1k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B4B9G5P2wks2W
No, but public transportation bodies should be compassionate nevertheless, without being required.
@B39866F2mos2MO
No they would be banned unless if they in a wheelchair and can talk etc. just have they legs broken or cut off
@B2ZHWGD2mos2MO
Yes, for publicly owned public transport. Privatised options should be allowed to coexist without the same requirements.
@B2PSGJR2mos2MO
Yes, with a transition period to allow for required upgrades rather than replacing existing functioning systems
@B2CRG6D3mos3MO
No. Australia is already one of the best. Only include this for new infrastructure
@9ZTQK9J 5mos5MO
It depends on circumstance and only do when viable to implement.
@9WXVR3Z6mos6MO
No. But suitable alternatives should be available for those with disabilities
@9WBCNY86mos6MO
No, but must provide alternative accessible public transportation to those that need them
Join in on the most popular conversations.
