Full accessibility ensures that public transportation accommodates people with disabilities by providing necessary facilities and services. Proponents argue that it ensures equal access, promotes independence for people with disabilities, and complies with disability rights. Opponents argue that it can be costly to implement and maintain and may require significant modifications to existing systems.
Response rates from 694 Australia voters.
94% Yes |
6% No |
94% Yes |
6% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 694 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 694 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B39866F2wks2W
No they would be banned unless if they in a wheelchair and can talk etc. just have they legs broken or cut off
@B2ZHWGD3wks3W
Yes, for publicly owned public transport. Privatised options should be allowed to coexist without the same requirements.
@B2PSGJR1mo1MO
Yes, with a transition period to allow for required upgrades rather than replacing existing functioning systems
@B2CRG6D2mos2MO
No. Australia is already one of the best. Only include this for new infrastructure
@9ZTQK9J 3mos3MO
It depends on circumstance and only do when viable to implement.
@9WXVR3Z4mos4MO
No. But suitable alternatives should be available for those with disabilities
@9WBCNY85mos5MO
No, but must provide alternative accessible public transportation to those that need them
Join in on the most popular conversations.
