Ride-sharing services, like Uber and Lyft, provide transportation options that can be subsidized to make them more affordable for low-income individuals. Proponents argue that it increases mobility for low-income individuals, reduces reliance on personal vehicles, and can reduce traffic congestion. Opponents argue that it is a misuse of public funds, may benefit ride-sharing companies more than individuals, and could discourage public transportation use.
Response rates from 776 Australia voters.
44% Yes |
56% No |
44% Yes |
56% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 776 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 776 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B4MJ5WK6 days6D
Yes, but only if it's proven to be used as travel to the worplace
@B4F388C2wks2W
No, "ride-sharing" is a glorified taxi; subsidise collective transport instead
@B4F2PBT2wks2W
Yes, but only in areas with restricted public transport options
@B4BMG2G2wks2W
Yes, and the government should run a public ride sharing service with salaried drivers.
@B497W2W3wks3W
Yes, for acceptable services. EG. going to Hospital, training, and schools etc.
@B48WS3Z3wks3W
No, subsidise public transport for low-income individuals
@B3TZ7VF1mo1MO
No, we should aim to provide more free public transportation.
@B3RF2P51mo1MO
All public transport should be free and paid for by the government through tax.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
