Ride-sharing services, like Uber and Lyft, provide transportation options that can be subsidized to make them more affordable for low-income individuals. Proponents argue that it increases mobility for low-income individuals, reduces reliance on personal vehicles, and can reduce traffic congestion. Opponents argue that it is a misuse of public funds, may benefit ride-sharing companies more than individuals, and could discourage public transportation use.
Response rates from 289 Australia voters.
40% Yes |
60% No |
40% Yes |
60% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 289 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 289 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZTPDVM3wks3W
No, but subsidize publicly owned transport instead for low income individuals.
@9YLH5TZ 1mo1MO
No, the government should expand public transport networks and reduce public transport costs
@9QZJSXK5mos5MO
Concessions and/or assistance should be available for people who need it (eg disabled & elderly) without having to ride share as it's not always applicable.
@9QSVZXT6mos6MO
No, use any funds that may go to this for public transport
Join in on the most popular conversations.
