Fuel efficiency standards set the required average fuel economy for vehicles, aiming to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Proponents argue that it helps reduce emissions, save consumers money on fuel, and decrease reliance on fossil fuels. Opponents argue that it raises production costs, leading to higher vehicle prices, and may not have a significant impact on overall emissions.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
State
Response rates from 1.4k Australia voters.
61% Yes |
39% No |
61% Yes |
39% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.4k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.4k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B2WGS2X1mo1MO
No, we should be funding research into alternative fuels, such as hydrogen.
@B2SXP9S1mo1MO
Yes, but incentivize it instead of forcing the fuel efficiency standards.
@B2DNDWQ2mos2MO
Yes, as long as production costs are not raised, and there is a significant impact on emissions
@B24STGS3mos3MO
Yes, provided there is incentivization to implement them.
@9ZWJCP83mos3MO
No, the fuel efficiency standards don't need to go even further since there was already a new fuel efficiency standards
@9ZTPDVM3mos3MO
No, but incentivize companies to do so voluntarily.
@9YLJ57B4mos4MO
Yes, but government funding should be directed at creating sustainable fuels that are cheaper.
@9SYC4SQ6mos6MO
Yes but a bit of subsidies for low-income consumers again
Join in on the most popular conversations.
