Fuel efficiency standards set the required average fuel economy for vehicles, aiming to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Proponents argue that it helps reduce emissions, save consumers money on fuel, and decrease reliance on fossil fuels. Opponents argue that it raises production costs, leading to higher vehicle prices, and may not have a significant impact on overall emissions.
Response rates from 428 Left voters.
76% Yes |
24% No |
76% Yes |
24% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 428 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 428 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B24STGS3wks3W
Yes, provided there is incentivization to implement them.
@9ZWJCP81mo1MO
No, the fuel efficiency standards don't need to go even further since there was already a new fuel efficiency standards
@9ZTPDVM1mo1MO
No, but incentivize companies to do so voluntarily.
@9YLJ57B2mos2MO
Yes, but government funding should be directed at creating sustainable fuels that are cheaper.
@9SYC4SQ4mos4MO
Yes but a bit of subsidies for low-income consumers again
@9RD9KL26mos6MO
No, however make it an incentive to buy more fuel efficient cars.
@9R36Q5Y6mos6MO
No. Fuel prices are expensive but this is not the main reason. We need to reopen our oil refineries to reduce fuel prices.
@9QZJSXK6mos6MO
Yes, but find a way to ameliorate impact on lower income people.
Join in on the most popular conversations.