High-speed rail networks are fast train systems that connect major cities, providing a quick and efficient alternative to car and air travel. Proponents argue that it can reduce travel times, lower carbon emissions, and stimulate economic growth through improved connectivity. Opponents argue that it requires significant investment, may not attract enough users, and funds could be better used elsewhere.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Ideology
State
Federal Electorate
Response rates from 618 Left voters.
84% Yes |
16% No |
84% Yes |
16% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 618 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 618 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9SB24SP3mos3MO
Yes, as long as they are environmentally friendly.
@9RZDKRX4mos4MO
They should invest in it themselves. Subsidies only increases the cost to 3rd parties aka childcare.
@9RTTQWK4mos4MO
Remove the red tape and regulation and allow the market to take care of it.
@9QZJSXK4mos4MO
High speed rail networks should be nationalised only.
@9QS3S9L5mos5MO
Yes, these should go to private companies who compete to build the best networks possible.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “High Speed Rail” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
