Increased funding would enhance the capacity and quality of shelters and services that provide support for homeless individuals. Proponents argue that it provides essential support for the homeless and helps reduce homelessness. Opponents argue that it is costly and may not address the root causes of homelessness.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
State Electorate
Suburb
Response rates from 1.7k Australia voters.
85% Yes |
15% No |
85% Yes |
15% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.7k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.7k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZSVZT24mos4MO
Yes, But they should not only increase the funding of this but other areas too to alleviate stress on these shelters and services.
@9ZL34PS5mos5MO
Yes, but they should keep a register of people and give priority to people who are actually trying to improve their situation.
@B3999CS1mo1MO
not the people who are taking advantage of it. only the ones who are truly trying and need some help.
@B2X3T9T2mos2MO
Same money with new initiatives. What we have is expensive and doesn’t work
@B2SXP9S2mos2MO
Yes, so long it goes towards services aimed at bringing them out of poverty.
@B2PQJWC2mos2MO
Existing funding should be better targeted and more effective
@B2PN3XB2mos2MO
Homeless shelters and services should be well funded and operated through the government, rather than private charities.
@B2KWFG62mos2MO
no but not cutting the funding, focus on how to resolve homelessness like in Finland and UAE.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
