Increased funding would enhance the capacity and quality of shelters and services that provide support for homeless individuals. Proponents argue that it provides essential support for the homeless and helps reduce homelessness. Opponents argue that it is costly and may not address the root causes of homelessness.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
State
Response rates from 211 New South Wales voters.
85% Yes |
15% No |
85% Yes |
15% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 211 New South Wales voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 211 New South Wales voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from New South Wales voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B2PQJWC6 days6D
Existing funding should be better targeted and more effective
@B2PN3XB6 days6D
Homeless shelters and services should be well funded and operated through the government, rather than private charities.
@B2KWFG62wks2W
no but not cutting the funding, focus on how to resolve homelessness like in Finland and UAE.
@B2FTPK3 3wks3W
Yes, but also put more focus on reducing homelessness with affordable housing.
@B2DVYCF3wks3W
Upstream causes of homelessness should be addressed i.e. Unaffordability, Addiction/Mental Illness, FDV. Access to essential services, including safe sleeping places and healthcare should be guaranteed.
@B22G8ZN2mos2MO
Idc where the funding comes from, government, charities, etc. As long as there’s funding for these services.
@9ZSVZT22mos2MO
Yes, But they should not only increase the funding of this but other areas too to alleviate stress on these shelters and services.
@9ZL34PS3mos3MO
Yes, but they should keep a register of people and give priority to people who are actually trying to improve their situation.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
