Incentives could include financial support or tax breaks for developers to build housing that is affordable for low- and middle-income families. Proponents argue that it increases the supply of affordable housing and addresses housing shortages. Opponents argue that it interferes with the housing market and can be costly for taxpayers.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 235 Liberals voters.
85% Yes |
15% No |
85% Yes |
15% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 235 Liberals voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 235 Liberals voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Liberals voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9PDPBQY10mos10MO
Yes, as long as it does not interfere with the housing market, and is not costly for taxpayers.
@B4BQ9TL2 days2D
Yes, but ensure the developers are making housing that whoever lives in it can keep cost low. for example, no drafts, solar, heavily insulated and control venting for the climates they are made it.
@B4B8W643 days3D
Yes, but affordable housing needs to actually be affordable. 10-20% less than market rent is not enough to help the housing crisis.
@B3GQLSG1mo1MO
The government should build more public housing, that is high density and affordable. it will create jobs and slow the rising of housing prices
@B3G9BMS1mo1MO
Yes, but introduce a bar of quality that developers must reach. So that new housing is also livable and well made housing that will last for decades
@B33879H2mos2MO
Yes, as long as the funds are diverted from already existing taxpayer-funded programs so there's no tax increase
@B2YKDVR2mos2MO
No, there should be limits on investment properties and more regulations on rental properties to ensure the housing that already exists can be utilised
@B2QFZL62mos2MO
No, the government should be building government owned housing for low income households, to compete with the private market
Join in on the most popular conversations.
