Incentives could include financial support or tax breaks for developers to build housing that is affordable for low- and middle-income families. Proponents argue that it increases the supply of affordable housing and addresses housing shortages. Opponents argue that it interferes with the housing market and can be costly for taxpayers.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Local Government Area
State Electorate
Suburb
Postcode
Response rates from 162 Melbourne voters.
90% Yes |
10% No |
90% Yes |
10% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 162 Melbourne voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 162 Melbourne voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Melbourne voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9PDPBQY5mos5MO
Yes, as long as it does not interfere with the housing market, and is not costly for taxpayers.
@9ZM933G4 days4D
The government should be building affordable housing. What is this incentivize the construction of?
Are you saying you no longer build public housing and the reason we are facing this mess is because government didnt incentivize enough builders/companies to take up the plight for building public housing? Thats exactly what this question seems to suggest when also paired up with the state of our country right now.
@9QS3S9L5mos5MO
Yes, but fund it through other ways rather than income tax alone.
@9PSLVTY5mos5MO
Yes, as long as it is not costly for taxpayers, and if it does not interfere with the housing market.
@9MQ83P26mos6MO
Money is better spent on encouraging people to work, to able to afford their own housing. Also, property and rent prices should be decreased.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
