+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 4.2k Australia voters.

92%
Yes
8%
No
92%
Yes
8%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 4.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 4.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZF8CW5answered…5mos5MO

yes, as long as we actively address other factors such as limiting tax breaks on investment properties

 @9WCPZ63answered…6mos6MO

will only add to house price increases, de-incentivise investment housing as the primary investment choice for Australians instead by ending negative gearing and tax breaks for people who own multiple properties.

 @9PJWSBTanswered…10mos10MO

 @B4TLLTNanswered…1 day1D

Yes but also include people who are older where they have not owned a house in many years or where they owned a home with another person but is seeking to buy as a single

 @B4K2CYYanswered…2wks2W

I think a government housing saving scheme that operates similar to how super works but for purchasing a house could be a good idea. It would have to be opt-in and the government would add savings to the account in proportion to how much you add.

 @B4BT64Danswered…3wks3W

Yes, but only for buyers that have proven that they need the money, as many people are just irresponsible with money and don't deserve any subsidies.

 @B49Q8B3answered…4wks4W

Yes, and the blanket rule they have for the entry price is rubbish. For example, someone living in a city will struggle to find property listed at a price that gives them access to first home buyers schemes.