These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to higher prices.
Response rates from 1.1k Australia voters.
92% Yes |
8% No |
92% Yes |
8% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.1k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.1k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9TBYTMW4wks4W
current subsidy not effective - supply problem need to increase housing supply
@9T4MTQN1mo1MO
Stamp duty should be reviewed particularly in NSW rather than funding new buyers creating more demand, therefore higher prices. Subsidise retirees to downsize to open more houses for sale. More stock lower prices.
@9SZNK9N1mo1MO
Yes but only if a way can be found that doesn't automatically hike the price in keeping, which amounts to the subsidy benefitting the seller, not the first home buyer.
@9SWQZYB1mo1MO
Yes, first time home buyers need a leg up over investors
@9PJWSBT4mos4MO
No it should be there labour to purchase their home not our money
Join in on the most popular conversations.
