These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to higher prices.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Local Government Area
Response rates from 2.8k Australia voters.
92% Yes |
8% No |
92% Yes |
8% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.8k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.8k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZTQK9J 3wks3W
No, it distorts the market and puts first home owners in more debt due to increasing demand for entry level properties
@9SWQZYB4mos4MO
Yes, first time home buyers need a leg up over investors
@9WCPZ632mos2MO
will only add to house price increases, de-incentivise investment housing as the primary investment choice for Australians instead by ending negative gearing and tax breaks for people who own multiple properties.
@9TBYTMW3mos3MO
current subsidy not effective - supply problem need to increase housing supply
@9T4MTQN4mos4MO
Stamp duty should be reviewed particularly in NSW rather than funding new buyers creating more demand, therefore higher prices. Subsidise retirees to downsize to open more houses for sale. More stock lower prices.
@9SZNK9N4mos4MO
Yes but only if a way can be found that doesn't automatically hike the price in keeping, which amounts to the subsidy benefitting the seller, not the first home buyer.
@9PJWSBT6mos6MO
No it should be there labour to purchase their home not our money
@9ZF8CW51mo1MO
yes, as long as we actively address other factors such as limiting tax breaks on investment properties
Join in on the most popular conversations.
