+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 262 Labor voters.

95%
Yes
5%
No
95%
Yes
5%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 262 Labor voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 262 Labor voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Labor voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZTQK9J answered…2mos2MO

No, it distorts the market and puts first home owners in more debt due to increasing demand for entry level properties

 @9ZF8CW5answered…3mos3MO

yes, as long as we actively address other factors such as limiting tax breaks on investment properties

 @9WNJ2H2from Virginia  answered…3mos3MO

No, it drives up prices. They need to stop immigration for many years and let housing catch-up. Also prevent investors from buying existing stock (only new builds) if that will help too.

 @9WCPZ63answered…3mos3MO

will only add to house price increases, de-incentivise investment housing as the primary investment choice for Australians instead by ending negative gearing and tax breaks for people who own multiple properties.

 @9TBYTMWanswered…5mos5MO

current subsidy not effective - supply problem need to increase housing supply

 @9T4MTQNanswered…5mos5MO

Stamp duty should be reviewed particularly in NSW rather than funding new buyers creating more demand, therefore higher prices. Subsidise retirees to downsize to open more houses for sale. More stock lower prices.

 @9SZNK9Nanswered…5mos5MO

Yes but only if a way can be found that doesn't automatically hike the price in keeping, which amounts to the subsidy benefitting the seller, not the first home buyer.